Perceived Health After Kidney Transplantation: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Long-term and Short-term Cohorts

T. Schulz, J. Niesing, J. J. Homan van der Heide, R. Westerhuis, R. J. Ploeg, A. V. Ranchor*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although increased longevity of grafts has led to a growing number of long-term kidney transplant recipients, knowledge about the perceived health of these patients remains limited. A cross-sectional sample of 609 patients (60% response) was stratified into a short-term (1 and 8 and .05). Furthermore, symptoms were less influential for perceived health among long- versus short-term (z = -2.08, P = .038) or midterm cohorts (z = -2.60, P = .009). Previously identified predictors of perceived health accounted for less variance in the long-term as opposed to short-term (z = 4.30, P <.001) and midterm cohort (z = 2.07, P = .039). Despite more symptoms and comorbidities, the perceived health of long-term kidney transplant recipients was comparable to the short- and midterm, possibly due to selective survival or patient adjustment. Because kidney function and symptoms were predominantly associated with short-term perceived health, there is an urgent need to identify variables associated with long-term perceived health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2184-2190
Number of pages7
JournalTransplantation Proceedings
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION
  • SYMPTOM EXPERIENCE
  • CHRONIC DISEASES
  • RECIPIENTS
  • SIDE
  • OUTCOMES
  • MORTALITY
  • PATIENT
  • SCALE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceived Health After Kidney Transplantation: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Long-term and Short-term Cohorts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this