To evaluate performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) beyond double reading for pulmonary nodules on low-dose computed tomography (CT) by nodule volume.
A total of 400 low-dose chest CT examinations were randomly selected from the NELSON lung cancer screening trial. CTs were evaluated by two independent readers and processed by CAD. A total of 1,667 findings marked by readers and/or CAD were evaluated by a consensus panel of expert chest radiologists. Performance was evaluated by calculating sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection and number of false positives, by nodule characteristics and volume.
According to the screening protocol, 90.9 % of the findings could be excluded from further evaluation, 49.2 % being small nodules (less than 50 mm(3)). Excluding small nodules reduced false-positive detections by CAD from 3.7 to 1.9 per examination. Of 151 findings that needed further evaluation, 33 (21.9 %) were detected by CAD only, one of them being diagnosed as lung cancer the following year. The sensitivity of nodule detection was 78.1 % for double reading and 96.7 % for CAD. A total of 69.7 % of nodules undetected by readers were attached nodules of which 78.3 % were vessel-attached.
CAD is valuable in lung cancer screening to improve sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection beyond double reading, at a low false-positive rate when excluding small nodules.
aEuro cent Computer-aided detection (CAD) has known advantages for computed tomography (CT).
aEuro cent Combined CAD/nodule size cut-off parameters assist CT lung cancer screening.
aEuro cent This combination improves the sensitivity of pulmonary nodule detection by CT.
aEuro cent It increases the positive predictive value for cancer detection.
- Computer-aided detection
- Multi-detector computed tomography
- Pulmonary nodules
- Low dose
- INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS
- EARLY LUNG-CANCER
- DETECTION CAD
- 2ND READER
- SPIRAL CT
- RADIOLOGIST PERFORMANCE
- AUTOMATIC DETECTION
- DIAGNOSIS SYSTEM
- SCREENING TRIAL