Abstract
There is growing evidence from clinical trials that losartan (Avastar(TM), Merck & Co., Inc.) and other angiotensin (A)-II-receptor antagonists have beneficial effects on the progression of renal disease among Type 2 diabetic patients beyond the benefits derived from the effect of blood-pressure lowering alone. Comparators used is the studies were not angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors but typically conventional hypertensive therapy plus placebo, placebo alone and in one case, amlodipine. These trials have reported reductions in progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD) (losartan and irbesartan) and to nephropathy (irbesartan). An important pharmacoeconomic question is whether potential cost-savings on reduced progression to ESRD and nephropathy outweigh the extra costs of A-II-antagonist treatment. This paper will review the published economic studies for A-II-receptor antagonists and their pharmacoeconomic implications. In particular, potential pharmacoeconomic implications and related methodological aspects of the recent RENAAL trial for losartan are considered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1543-1550 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept-2003 |
Keywords
- angiotensin-II receptor antagonists
- losartan
- pharmacoeconomics
- RENAAL trial
- Type 2 diabetes
- CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS
- COST-EFFECTIVENESS
- MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS
- RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS
- NEPHROPATHY
- MELLITUS
- HYPERTENSION
- IRBESARTAN
- OUTCOMES
- TRIAL