Pharmacoeconomic aspects of losartan treatment to delay progression of renal disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes

  • MJ Postma*
  • , H Kruidhof
  • , LTW de Jong-van den Berg
  • , D de Zeeuw
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is growing evidence from clinical trials that losartan (Avastar(TM), Merck & Co., Inc.) and other angiotensin (A)-II-receptor antagonists have beneficial effects on the progression of renal disease among Type 2 diabetic patients beyond the benefits derived from the effect of blood-pressure lowering alone. Comparators used is the studies were not angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors but typically conventional hypertensive therapy plus placebo, placebo alone and in one case, amlodipine. These trials have reported reductions in progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD) (losartan and irbesartan) and to nephropathy (irbesartan). An important pharmacoeconomic question is whether potential cost-savings on reduced progression to ESRD and nephropathy outweigh the extra costs of A-II-antagonist treatment. This paper will review the published economic studies for A-II-receptor antagonists and their pharmacoeconomic implications. In particular, potential pharmacoeconomic implications and related methodological aspects of the recent RENAAL trial for losartan are considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1543-1550
Number of pages8
JournalExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Volume4
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2003

Keywords

  • angiotensin-II receptor antagonists
  • losartan
  • pharmacoeconomics
  • RENAAL trial
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS
  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS
  • MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS
  • RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS
  • NEPHROPATHY
  • MELLITUS
  • HYPERTENSION
  • IRBESARTAN
  • OUTCOMES
  • TRIAL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmacoeconomic aspects of losartan treatment to delay progression of renal disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this