Places from the past lost in new towns: Places from the past lost in new towns

Terry Van Dijk*, Gerd Weitkamp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The metropolis of Hong Kong has expanded enormously since 1960, by means of a New Town strategy. On its main land, self contained cities were built to accommodate the population growth of as much as a million inhabitants per decade. Allegedly without paying much attention to built cultural heritage. This paper reports on a systematic comparison for all New Towns to see how much heritage has survived. Standardised maps were made showing the pre-New Town land use (the villages in particular), the New Town master plan, and the current land use. Most villages that existed in 1960 are still there, although they are rarely integrated as an asset for the New Town. The appreciation for built cultural heritage did increase over the last two decades. This confirms the hypothesis that after a period where housing to accommodate in-migration was most important, currently the need for a Hong Kong identity is growing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-220
Number of pages24
JournalMetu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Heritage
  • new town
  • master plan
  • planning
  • urbanisation
  • HERITAGE
  • CONSERVATION
  • TOURISM

Cite this