Pleitbezorger van de voetbalkijker: Het discours over voetbal op televisie in de Nederlandse dagbladen tussen 1950 en 1980

Translated title of the contribution: Advocate of the footbal audience: The discourse about footbal on television in Dutch dailies between 1950 and 1980

Vallinga Mark, Frank Harbers*, Marcel Broersma

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Between 1950 and 1980, television in the Netherlands became a mass medium, which attracted a large audience, in part by broadcasting football matches and news. Scholars have theorised how the rise of a new medium creates anxiety and feelings of rivalry with established media as they are confronted with a new competitor. This paper focuses on this premise by examining to what extent and how such feelings of rivalry between television and newspapers are part of the metadiscourse on football and television within the ranks of Dutch dailies between 1950 and 1980. Based on the results of this qualitative discourse analysis, this paper argues that newspapers certainly discussed the rise of football coverage on television, but did not show any signs of being afraid that television would offer a harmful competition. Much rather, in defending the right to free news gathering as well as the interests of the audience, newspapers positioned themselves by and large as great supporters of football coverage on television.

Translated title of the contributionAdvocate of the footbal audience: The discourse about footbal on television in Dutch dailies between 1950 and 1980
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)1-33
Number of pages33
JournalTMG Journal for Media History
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Football on Television
  • Media History
  • Remediation
  • Newspaper discourse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advocate of the footbal audience: The discourse about footbal on television in Dutch dailies between 1950 and 1980'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this