Abstract
implantation are scarce, or executed in specific patient subgroups (regarding age or specific cardiac rhythm disorders). The purpose of this study was to systematically assess the HRQoL in a large unselected cohort of patients with a conventional indication for PM therapy.
Methods: Pre-PM implantation HRQoL (measured with the SF-36 questionnaire, completed at hospital admission) of 818 consecutive Dutch patients included in the FOLLOWPACE study was compared with the HRQoL in a sample of the general Dutch population, and with several cohorts of patients with other conditions. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze determinants of this HRQoL.
Results: Almost all SF-36 subscale scores, were substantially and significantly lower in the PM patients compared to the general population, with. P-volues <0.001 in all SF-36 subscales except for "pain" and "general health perception." In the P-W patients, presence of comorbidities, gender, and age were significantly associated with the overall physical component summary score (mean 38.8 +/- 27 standard deviation) whereas the overall mental component summaryscore (46.8 +/- 27.0) was associated with gender and age.
Conclusion: The HRQoL of patients before first PM implantation is significantly lower than that of a general population and also various other patient populations. Physicians should be aware of this unfavorable condition and keep the time interval between the diagnosis of a cardiac rhythm disorder requiring PM implantation and the implantation procedure as short as possible.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 480-486 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - Apr-2008 |
Keywords
- pacemaker
- rhythm disorders
- quality of life
- SF-36
- comparison
- determinants
- MODE SELECTION TRIAL
- CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE
- ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION
- SURVEY SF-36
- IMPLANTATION
- OUTCOMES
- DISEASE
- QUESTIONNAIRE