Post hoc analysis of the SuperB and Zilverpass trials for treatment of long and complex superficial femoral artery lesions

  • Laurens A. van Walraven
  • , Vitória M. Kalil
  • , Daphne van der Veen
  • , Michel J. Bosiers
  • , Koen Deloose
  • , Suzanne Holewijn
  • , Clark J. Zeebregts
  • , Michel M.P.J. Reijnen*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
96 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: In two randomized controlled trials, the outcomes of endovascular treatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial lesions were compared with bypass surgery and considered a valid alternative treatment. The aim of this study was to compare both endovascular treatment options with the hypothesis that implantation of heparin-bonded self-expanding covered stents (Viabahn [SECS]) or drug-eluting stents (ZilverPTX [DES]) are related to similar clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up. 

Methods: In a post-hoc analysis, the SuperB trial and Zilverpass databases were merged. Patients in the endovascular treatment arms were included, and data was analyzed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol (PP) fashion. Data included baseline and lesion characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up data. The primary endpoint of this study was primary patency at 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were secondary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), limb loss, and all-cause mortality. 

Results: A total of 176 patients were included; 63 in the SECS arm and 113 in the DES arm. Through 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in primary patency (ITT: 63.4% vs 71.1%: P =.183 and PP: 60.8% vs 71.1%; P =.100). Secondary patency rates were not significantly different in the ITT analysis (86.5% vs 95.1%; P =.054), but in the PP analysis, there was a significant difference in favor of the DES group (SECS, 85.6% vs DES, 95.1%; P =.038). There was no significant difference in freedom from TLR between groups (79.6% vs 77.0%; P =.481). No major amputations were performed in the SECS group, and two were performed in the DES group (1.8%). Survival rate was 98.2% in the SECS group, and 91.3% in the DES group after 1-year follow-up (P =.106). Based on diagnosis (intermittent claudication vs chronic limb-threatening ischemia) no differences between patients with intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia were observed in primary patency, secondary patency and freedom from TLR. 

Conclusions: Treatment of complex femoropopliteal arterial disease with the heparin-bonded Viabahn endoprosthesis and the Zilver PTX drug-eluting stent are related to similar primary and secondary patency, and TLR rates at 1 year, except for secondary patency in the PP analysis. This study further supports the endovascular treatment of long complex lesions in the femoropopliteal artery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-514.e2
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume80
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug-2024

Keywords

  • Covered stents
  • Drug eluting stents
  • SFA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post hoc analysis of the SuperB and Zilverpass trials for treatment of long and complex superficial femoral artery lesions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this