Predictors of perceived health status in patients after kidney transplantation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)
431 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background. Patients after kidney transplantation have decreased mortality, morbidity and better quality of life compared to people on dialysis. Major efforts are being directed towards research into graft and patient survival. Research into quality of life is less intensive. The aim of this study was to explore the predictors of perceived health status (PHS) in kidney transplant recipients.

Methods. Out of 218 patients after kidney transplantation 138 participated in the study. Linear regression analysis was performed to predict PHS, measured with the SF-36 questionnaire, in three age categories (<40, 40-59, >= 60 years). Independent variables included social support (measured with the Social Support List Discrepancies questionnaire), sociodemographic and medical variables, side effects and compliance.

Results. Predictors of better PHS in patients <40 years were better social support (P

Conclusions. Major differences exist in PHS among kidney transplant recipients depending on their age. Side effects of therapy are the most important predictor of PHS for all age groups. PHS of young patients mostly depends on their renal function and their social support. Education and working activities are most important for middle-aged people whereas in older patients PHS is mostly affected by comorbidity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1306-1310
Number of pages5
JournalTransplantation
Volume81
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15-May-2006

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • perceived health status
  • kidney transplantation
  • SF-36
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • STAGE RENAL-DISEASE
  • SOCIAL SUPPORT
  • DIALYSIS
  • MORTALITY
  • OUTCOMES
  • FAILURE

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of perceived health status in patients after kidney transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this