Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents

Frank Vanclay*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

141 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The "International Principles for Social Impact Assessment" and the "Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment in the USA", both developed under the auspices of the International Association for Impact Assessment and published in 2003, are compared. Major differences in the definition and approach to social impact assessment (SIA) are identified. The US Principles and Guidelines is shown to be positivist/technocratic while the International Principles is identified as being democratic, participatory and constructivist. Deficiencies in both documents are identified. The field of SIA is changing to go beyond the prevention of negative impacts, to include issues of building social capital, capacity building, good governance, community engagement and social inclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Jan-2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Guidelines and Principles
  • International Principles
  • NEPA
  • SIA
  • Social impact assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this