Prioritising nurses' and doctors' health at work: a scoping review of monitoring instruments

Amber Boskma*, Kim Braak, Kiki Demenaga, Demy Idema, Lotty Hooft, Götz Wietasch, Arie Franx, Maarten J. van der Laan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nurses' and doctors' health at work is crucial for their overall performance and the quality of care they provide. The Jobs Demands Resources (JD-R) model offers a framework for health at work, encompassing 'job demands', 'job resources', 'personal resources', 'leadership', 'well-being' and 'outcomes'. While various instruments exist to measure health, an overview of instruments specifically designed for assessing nurses and doctors health is currently missing. This study provides a comprehensive overview of available health instruments specifically developed and validated for healthcare professionals in hospital care.

DESIGN: Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies assessing the health of nurses and/or doctors in hospitals using or evaluating instruments based on the JD-R model, published between January 2011 and January 2024, excluding student-exclusive samples. 

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted data on study and sample characteristics, as well as details of the measurement instruments, including main and subconstructs. Instruments were categorised based on the JD-R model domains. Descriptive analysis and data visualisation were performed using Excel and Python.

RESULTS: We included 1204 studies, reporting 986 unique instruments. We identified 32 comprehensive instruments suitable for broad health screening, measuring four or more of the JD-R model domains. Additionally, we identified instruments focusing on specific domains for targeted screening needs. Furthermore, we present frequently reported instruments assumed to be extensively evaluated, user-friendly, accessible and available in multiple languages.

CONCLUSIONS: Health at work cannot be determined by a single instrument alone, underscoring the multidimensional nature of workplace health. Alternatively, organisations should select instruments based on domains most relevant and applicable to their context. This approach ensures a more comprehensive assessment of health at work.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere079861
Number of pages9
JournalBMJ Open
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17-Aug-2024

Keywords

  • burnout, professional
  • mental health
  • occupational stress
  • risk management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prioritising nurses' and doctors' health at work: a scoping review of monitoring instruments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this