Abstract
The link between the right to privacy and the right to democratic self-determination is often understood to imply that privacy rights have only instrumental value for democratic participation, and that they consist solely in the possibility to retreat from participation in a public. I examine three arguments for an internal link between both sets of rights: The right to privacy protects political public spheres from epistemic inequality, it protects groups in public from a loss of their deliberative autonomy and it blocks the colonisation of deliberative publics by strategic action orientations. These arguments suggest a genuine political purpose of the right to privacy.
Translated title of the contribution | Privacy Rights and the Political Public Sphere |
---|---|
Original language | German |
Title of host publication | Privatsphäre 4.0 |
Subtitle of host publication | Eine Neuverortung des Privaten im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung |
Editors | Hauke Behrendt, Wulf Loh, Tobias Matzner, Catrin Misselhorn |
Place of Publication | Stuttgart |
Publisher | J.B. Metzler Verlag |
Pages | 123-143 |
Number of pages | 21 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-3-476-04860-8 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-3-476-04859-2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23-Oct-2019 |
Keywords
- privacy
- public sphere
- Jürgen Habermas
- privacy in public
- surveillance
- political surveillance