TY - JOUR
T1 - Progression of conventional cardiovascular risk factors and vascular disease risk in individuals
T2 - insights from the PROG-IMT consortium
AU - PROG-IMT Study Grp
AU - Bahls, Martin
AU - Lorenz, Matthias W.
AU - Doerr, Marcus
AU - Gao, Lu
AU - Kitagawa, Kazuo
AU - Tuomainen, Tomi-Pekka
AU - Agewall, Stefan
AU - Berenson, Gerald
AU - Catapano, Alberico L.
AU - Norata, Giuseppe D.
AU - Bots, Michiel L.
AU - van Gilst, Wiek
AU - Asselbergs, Folkert W.
AU - Brouwers, Frank P.
AU - Uthoff, Heiko
AU - Sander, Dirk
AU - Poppert, Holger
AU - Olsen, Michael Hecht
AU - Empana, Jean Philippe
AU - Schminke, Ulf
AU - Baldassarre, Damiano
AU - Veglia, Fabrizio
AU - Franco, Oscar H.
AU - Kavousi, Maryam
AU - de Groot, Eric
AU - Mathiesen, Ellisiv B.
AU - Grigore, Liliana
AU - Polak, Joseph F.
AU - Rundek, Tatjana
AU - Stehouwer, Coen D. A.
AU - Skilton, Michael R.
AU - Hatzitolios, Apostolos
AU - Savopoulos, Christos
AU - Ntaios, George
AU - Plichart, Matthieu
AU - McLachlan, Stela
AU - Lind, Lars
AU - Willeit, Peter
AU - Steinmetz, Helmuth
AU - Desvarieux, Moise
AU - Ikram, M. Arfan
AU - Johnsen, Stein Harald
AU - Schmidt, Caroline
AU - Willeit, Johann
AU - Ducimetiere, Pierre
AU - Price, Jackie F.
AU - Bergstrom, Goran
AU - Kauhanen, Jussi
AU - Kiechl, Stefan
AU - Sitzer, Matthias
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Aims Averaged measurements, but not the progression based on multiple assessments of carotid intima-media thickness, (cIMT) are predictive of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in individuals. Whether this is true for conventional risk factors is unclear.Methods and results An individual participant meta-analysis was used to associate the annualised progression of systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with future cardiovascular disease risk in 13 prospective cohort studies of the PROG-IMT collaboration (n = 34,072). Follow-up data included information on a combined cardiovascular disease endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death. In secondary analyses, annualised progression was replaced with average. Log hazard ratios per standard deviation difference were pooled across studies by a random effects meta-analysis. In primary analysis, the annualised progression of total cholesterol was marginally related to a higher cardiovascular disease risk (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.07). The annualised progression of systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was not associated with future cardiovascular disease risk. In secondary analysis, average systolic blood pressure (HR 1.20 95% CI 1.11 to 1.29) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.16) were related to a greater, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) was related to a lower risk of future cardiovascular disease events.Conclusion Averaged measurements of systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol displayed significant linear relationships with the risk of future cardiovascular disease events. However, there was no clear association between the annualised progression of these conventional risk factors in individuals with the risk of future clinical endpoints.
AB - Aims Averaged measurements, but not the progression based on multiple assessments of carotid intima-media thickness, (cIMT) are predictive of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in individuals. Whether this is true for conventional risk factors is unclear.Methods and results An individual participant meta-analysis was used to associate the annualised progression of systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with future cardiovascular disease risk in 13 prospective cohort studies of the PROG-IMT collaboration (n = 34,072). Follow-up data included information on a combined cardiovascular disease endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death. In secondary analyses, annualised progression was replaced with average. Log hazard ratios per standard deviation difference were pooled across studies by a random effects meta-analysis. In primary analysis, the annualised progression of total cholesterol was marginally related to a higher cardiovascular disease risk (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.07). The annualised progression of systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was not associated with future cardiovascular disease risk. In secondary analysis, average systolic blood pressure (HR 1.20 95% CI 1.11 to 1.29) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.16) were related to a greater, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) was related to a lower risk of future cardiovascular disease events.Conclusion Averaged measurements of systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol displayed significant linear relationships with the risk of future cardiovascular disease events. However, there was no clear association between the annualised progression of these conventional risk factors in individuals with the risk of future clinical endpoints.
KW - Risk factors
KW - CVD biomarker
KW - risk factor progression
KW - INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS
KW - CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE
KW - CAROTID-ARTERY INTIMA
KW - DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL
KW - DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE
KW - MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
KW - BASE-LINE
KW - ATHEROSCLEROSIS
KW - STROKE
KW - METAANALYSIS
U2 - 10.1177/2047487319877078
DO - 10.1177/2047487319877078
M3 - Article
SN - 2047-4873
VL - 27
SP - 234
EP - 243
JO - European journal of preventive cardiology
JF - European journal of preventive cardiology
IS - 3
ER -