Prophylactic treatment of migraine in children. Part 2. A systematic review of pharmacological trials

L Damen*, J Bruijn, AP Verhagen, MY Berger, J Passchier, BW Koes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of pharmacological prophylactic treatments of migraine in children. Databases were searched from inception to June 2004 and references were checked. We selected controlled trials on the effects of pharmacological prophylactic treatments in children with migraine. We assessed trial quality using the Delphi list and extracted data. Analyses were carried out according to type of intervention. A total of 20 trials were included. Headache improvement was significantly higher for flunarizine compared with placebo (relative risk 4.00, 95% confidence interval 1.60, 9.97). There is conflicting evidence for the use of propranolol. Nimodipine, clonidine, L-5HTP, trazodone and papaverine showed no effect when compared with placebo. All medications were well tolerated and adverse events showed no significant differences. Flunarizine may be effective as prophylactic treatment for migraine in children. Because of the small number of studies and the methodological shortcomings, conclusions regarding effectiveness have to be drawn with caution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)497-505
Number of pages9
JournalCephalalgia
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May-2006

Keywords

  • migraine
  • children
  • systematic review
  • randomized clinical trial
  • prophylaxis
  • CONTROLLED CROSSOVER TRIAL
  • CHILDHOOD MIGRAINE
  • DOUBLE-BLIND
  • PEDIATRIC MIGRAINE
  • VASCULAR HEADACHE
  • PLACEBO
  • FLUNARIZINE
  • PROPRANOLOL
  • GUIDELINES
  • PIZOTIFEN

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prophylactic treatment of migraine in children. Part 2. A systematic review of pharmacological trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this