Prospective ARNI vs. ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction (PARADISE-MI): design and baseline characteristics

Karola S. Jering, Brian Claggett, Marc A. Pfeffer*, Christopher Granger, Lars Kober, Eldrin F. Lewis, Aldo P. Maggioni, Douglas Mann, John J. V. McMurray, Jean-Lucien Rouleau, Scott D. Solomon, Philippe G. Steg, Peter van Der Meer, Margaret Wernsing, Katherine Carter, Weinong Guo, Yinong Zhou, Martin Lefkowitz, Jianjian Gong, Yi WangBela Merkely, Stella M. Macin, Urmil Shah, Jose C. Nicolau, Eugene Braunwald

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)
583 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims Patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at risk of developing symptomatic heart failure (HF) or premature death. We hypothesized that sacubitril/valsartan, effective in the treatment of chronic HF, prevents development of HF and reduces cardiovascular death following high-risk AMI compared to a proven angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. This paper describes the study design and baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Prospective ARNI vs. ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction (PARADISE-MI) trial.

Methods and results PARADISE-MI, a multinational (41 countries), double-blind, active-controlled trial, randomized patients within 0.5-7 days of presentation with index AMI to sacubitril/valsartan or ramipril. Transient pulmonary congestion and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = 70 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate = III, ST-elevation myocardial infarction without reperfusion) were required for inclusion. PARADISE-MI was event-driven targeting 708 primary endpoints (cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization or outpatient development of HF). Randomization of 5669 patients occurred 4.3 +/- 1.8 days from presentation with index AMI. The mean age was 64 +/- 12 years, 24% were women. The majority (76%) qualified with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; acute percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 88% and thrombolysis in 6%. LVEF was 37 +/- 9% and 58% were in Killip class >= II.

Conclusions Baseline therapies in PARADISE-MI reflect advances in contemporary evidence-based care. With enrollment complete PARADISE-MI is poised to determine whether sacubitril/valsartan is more effective than a proven ACE inhibitor in preventing development of HF and cardiovascular death following AMI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1040-1048
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume23
Issue number6
Early online date12-Apr-2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun-2021

Keywords

  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Heart failure
  • Angiotensin&#8208
  • converting enzyme inhibitor
  • Angiotensin receptor&#8211
  • neprilysin inhibitor
  • Sacubitril
  • valsartan
  • LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION
  • CONVERTING-ENZYME INHIBITOR
  • ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION
  • NEPRILYSIN INHIBITION
  • TASK-FORCE
  • CAPTOPRIL
  • MORTALITY
  • MANAGEMENT
  • MORBIDITY
  • SURVIVAL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective ARNI vs. ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction (PARADISE-MI): design and baseline characteristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this