Proving routines in a lecturer’s mathematical discourse for proof teaching: a case of analysis lecturing

Dimitri Lipper, Thomais Karavi*, Angeliki Mali

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study focuses on the characterisation of proof teaching in university lectures on mathematical analysis using the commognitive framework. The case is set around a lecturer with experience in teaching this course and a good reputation among university students. Six lectures of the course were analysed using discourse and thematic analysis. The analysis resulted in a range of characteristics of the mathematical discourse for proof teaching of a lecturer. Then, by exploring the proving routines within the characteristics, we produced a typology of teaching characteristics in the lecturer’s discourse; that typology gave us insights into a pattern of proving specific to our case study. The exploration of the proving routines in the lecturer’s discourse offered an in-depth understanding of teaching proof beyond the macro-level descriptions of lectures in the extant literature. We conclude the study with implications for research and education.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21-Jul-2024

    Keywords

    • commognition
    • Lecturing
    • mathematical analysis
    • proving routines
    • university mathematics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Proving routines in a lecturer’s mathematical discourse for proof teaching: a case of analysis lecturing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this