Quality of prediction: A critique of Bronner

  • Carina van Knippenberg-den Brinker
  • , John A. Michon
  • , Ad van Knippenberg*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this comment on Bronner's article ‘Decision style in transport mode choice’ two problems are discussed. The first and minor one deals with the choice of criterion in the model tests for the quality of prediction. The second and major problem concerns the invalidity of the model tests, which is due to the psychometrically incorrect classification procedure adopted by Bronner. This issue is extensively discussed because some of Bronner's conclusions can be shown to evolve from his incorrect assignment procedure.

    As an alternative method of attitude assignment the use of a matching constant is suggested. In order to evaluate predictive quality of models, it is recommended to consider mode choice as the criterion variable instead of attitudes within travel mode categories.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)103-108
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
    Volume2
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1982

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of prediction: A critique of Bronner'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this