TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of treatment and surgical approach for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a large European cohort
AU - IJzerman, Nikki S.
AU - Mohammadi, Mahmoud
AU - Tzanis, Dimitri
AU - Gelderblom, Hans
AU - Fiore, Marco
AU - Fumagalli, Elena
AU - Rutkowski, Piotr
AU - Bylina, Elzbieta
AU - Zavrakidis, Ioannis
AU - Steeghs, Neeltje
AU - Bonenkamp, Han J.
AU - van Etten, Boudewijn
AU - Grunhagen, Dirk J.
AU - Rasheed, Shahnawaz
AU - Tekkis, Paris
AU - Honore, Charles
AU - van Houdt, Winan
AU - van der Hage, Jos
AU - Bonvalot, Sylvie
AU - Schrage, Yvonne
AU - Smith, Myles
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Background: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTS) are rare tumours. Variability in the management may influence outcome, but there is a lack of understanding regarding contemporary variance in care. A multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study was performed to elucidate characteristics and outcomes of rectal GIST in European practice, with particular reference to surgical approach.Methods: All rectal GIST patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2018 were identified from five European databases. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Possible confounders were identified using Cox regression analyses.Results: From 210 patients, 155 patients had surgery. The three main types of surgery were local tumour resection (LTR, n = 46), low anterior resection (LAR, n = 31) and abdomino-perineal resection (APR, n = 32). Most patients received neoadjuvant (65%) and/or adjuvant imatinib therapy (66%). Local recurrence rate after surgery was 15% and overall recurrence rate 28%. No significant differences were found in terms of RFS nor OS between LTR, LAR and APR. However, locally resected tumours were smaller, while LAR and APR patients more often received perioperative imatinib. General hospitals treated smaller GISTS, offered imatinib less frequently, and had a higher tumour rupture rate. In the multivariate analysis in the group having LTR, APR or LAR, the only significant prognostic factor for local recurrence was higher age (HR 1.06, CI 1.00-1.12, p = 0.048).Conclusions: In European clinical practice for rectal GIST, LTR, LAR and APR have comparable local control. Multimodal approach is higher and tumour rupture less frequent in specialist centres compared to general hospitals. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
AB - Background: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTS) are rare tumours. Variability in the management may influence outcome, but there is a lack of understanding regarding contemporary variance in care. A multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study was performed to elucidate characteristics and outcomes of rectal GIST in European practice, with particular reference to surgical approach.Methods: All rectal GIST patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2018 were identified from five European databases. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Possible confounders were identified using Cox regression analyses.Results: From 210 patients, 155 patients had surgery. The three main types of surgery were local tumour resection (LTR, n = 46), low anterior resection (LAR, n = 31) and abdomino-perineal resection (APR, n = 32). Most patients received neoadjuvant (65%) and/or adjuvant imatinib therapy (66%). Local recurrence rate after surgery was 15% and overall recurrence rate 28%. No significant differences were found in terms of RFS nor OS between LTR, LAR and APR. However, locally resected tumours were smaller, while LAR and APR patients more often received perioperative imatinib. General hospitals treated smaller GISTS, offered imatinib less frequently, and had a higher tumour rupture rate. In the multivariate analysis in the group having LTR, APR or LAR, the only significant prognostic factor for local recurrence was higher age (HR 1.06, CI 1.00-1.12, p = 0.048).Conclusions: In European clinical practice for rectal GIST, LTR, LAR and APR have comparable local control. Multimodal approach is higher and tumour rupture less frequent in specialist centres compared to general hospitals. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
KW - Gastrointestinal stromal tumours
KW - Rectum
KW - Surgery
KW - Treatment outcome
KW - Survival
KW - PATHOLOGY
KW - SURVIVAL
KW - THERAPY
KW - ERA
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.033
DO - 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.033
M3 - Article
VL - 46
SP - 1124
EP - 1130
JO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - European Journal of Surgical Oncology
SN - 0748-7983
IS - 6
ER -