Quantifying and visualising uncertainty in deep learning-based segmentation for radiation therapy treatment planning: What do radiation oncologists and therapists want?

M. Huet-Dastarac*, N. M.C. van Acht, F. C. Maruccio, J. E. van Aalst, J. C.J. van Oorschodt, F. Cnossen, T. M. Janssen, C. L. Brouwer, A. Barragan Montero, C. W. Hurkmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: During the ESTRO 2023 physics workshop on “AI for the fully automated radiotherapy treatment chain”, the topic of deep learning (DL) segmentation was discussed. Despite its widespread use in radiotherapy, the time needed to evaluate and correct DL segmentations remains burdensome. While segmentation uncertainty could be beneficial for clinicians, there is a lack of understanding on what information should be presented to ease their task. This study aimed to gather insights from clinicians on uncertainty visualisation options.

Materials and methods: Two sessions of structured interviews were conducted across four institutions already using DL segmentation clinically. The first session focused on the main problems hindering the clinical use of DL. In the second session, ten visualisation options displaying uncertainty information at different levels (structure, slice, or voxel) with binary or continuous values were presented. Dosimetric information was also present in some visualisations. For each case, sixteen clinicians (radiation oncologists and radiation therapists) were asked to grade an overall score, the usability, the training required, and the expected time gain.

Results: Participants preferred the binary voxel-level uncertainty visualisation, followed by binary structure-level uncertainty visualisation. Combining structure-level and voxel-level visualisation methods has been proposed as a promising approach. The benefits of dosimetric information were perceived diversely among participants since it complexifies the display but could be useful for the online adaptive workflow.

Conclusion: Preferences for uncertainty visualisation methods were assessed within a multi-institutional experienced group of clinicians. Further refinement of preferences may help in selecting the best options for clinical implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110545
Number of pages8
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2024

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence/deep learning
  • Contouring/segmentation
  • Patient specific quality assurance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying and visualising uncertainty in deep learning-based segmentation for radiation therapy treatment planning: What do radiation oncologists and therapists want?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this