Ranked additive utility representations of gambles: Old and new axiomatizations

  • RD Luce*
  • , AAJ Marley
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of classical as well as quite new utility representations for gains are explored with the aim of understanding the behavioral conditions that are necessary and sufficient for various subfamilies of successively stronger representations to hold. Among the utility representations are: ranked additive, weighted, rank-dependent (which includes cumulative prospect theory as a special case), gains decomposition, subjective expected, and independent increments, where * denotes something new in this article. Among the key behavioral conditions are: idempotence, general event commutativity*, coalescing, gains decomposition, and component summing*. The structure of relations is sufficiently simple that certain key experiments are able to exclude entire classes of representations. For example, the class of rank-dependent utility models is very likely excluded because of empirical results about the failure of coalescing. Figures 1-3 summarize some of the primary results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-62
Number of pages42
JournalJournal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2005

Keywords

  • coalescing
  • component summing
  • event commutativity
  • gains decomposition
  • ranked additive utility
  • ranked weighted utility
  • utility representations
  • EXPECTED UTILITY
  • PROSPECT-THEORY
  • SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY
  • BRANCH INDEPENDENCE
  • VIOLATIONS
  • JUDGMENTS
  • AMBIGUITY
  • DECISION
  • TESTS
  • RISK

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ranked additive utility representations of gambles: Old and new axiomatizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this