Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply

Thomas Bernardes; Henk Groen

doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14299

Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply

Thomas Bernardes^*, Henk Groen

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	983-984
Number of pages	2
Journal	BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume	124
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14299
Publication status	Published - May-2017

Keywords

Bishop score
Induction of labour

Access to Document

10.1111/1471-0528.14299

Handle.net

Persistent link

Embargoed Document

Bernardes_et_al-2017-BJOG-_An_International_Journal_of_Obstetrics_&_Gynaecology
Final publisher's version, 186 KB

1 Editorial

Caesarean Section Rates and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes After Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management in Women With an Unripe Cervix: A Secondary Analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT Trials
Bernardes, T. P., Broekhuijsen, K., Koopmans, C. M., Boers, K. E., van Wyk, L., Tajik, P., van Pampus, M. G., Scherjon, S. A., Mol, B. W., Franssen, M. T., van den Berg, P. P. & Groen, H., Dec-2016, In: Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 71, 12, p. 691-692 2 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

Open Access
File

87 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this

Bernardes, T., & Groen, H. (2017). Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 124(6), 983-984. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14299

Bernardes, Thomas ; Groen, Henk. / Re : Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply. In: BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017 ; Vol. 124, No. 6. pp. 983-984.

@article{68d00dda0ac14d87a03a02d217fb8d4f,

title = "Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply",

keywords = "Bishop score, Induction of labour",

author = "Thomas Bernardes and Henk Groen",

year = "2017",

month = may,

doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.14299",

language = "English",

volume = "124",

pages = "983--984",

journal = "BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",

issn = "1470-0328",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "6",

}

Bernardes, T & Groen, H 2017, 'Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply', BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 983-984. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14299

Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply. / Bernardes, Thomas; Groen, Henk.
In: BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 124, No. 6, 05.2017, p. 983-984.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re

T2 - Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply

AU - Bernardes, Thomas

AU - Groen, Henk

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

KW - Bishop score

KW - Induction of labour

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.14299

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.14299

M3 - Letter

SN - 1470-0328

VL - 124

SP - 983

EP - 984

JO - BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

IS - 6

ER -

Bernardes T, Groen H. Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply. BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017 May;124(6):983-984. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14299

Re: Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials Local cervical ripening, induction of labour, and caesarean section rate Reply

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Embargoed Document

Research output

Caesarean Section Rates and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes After Induction of Labour Versus Expectant Management in Women With an Unripe Cervix: A Secondary Analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT Trials

Cite this