Recommendations for the creation of benchmark datasets for reproducible artificial intelligence in radiology

Nikos Sourlos, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Joao Santinha, Michail E. Klontzas, Renato Cuocolo, Merel Huisman, Peter van Ooijen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Various healthcare domains have witnessed successful preliminary implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, including radiology, though limited generalizability hinders their widespread adoption. Currently, most research groups and industry have limited access to the data needed for external validation studies. The creation and accessibility of benchmark datasets to validate such solutions represents a critical step towards generalizability, for which an array of aspects ranging from preprocessing to regulatory issues and biostatistical principles come into play. In this article, the authors provide recommendations for the creation of benchmark datasets in radiology, explain current limitations in this realm, and explore potential new approaches.

Clinical relevance statement: Benchmark datasets, facilitating validation of AI software performance can contribute to the adoption of AI in clinical practice.

Key Points: Benchmark datasets are essential for the validation of AI software performance. Factors like image quality and representativeness of cases should be considered. Benchmark datasets can help adoption by increasing the trustworthiness and robustness of AI. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)

Original languageEnglish
Article number248
Number of pages12
JournalInsights into Imaging
Volume15
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2024

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence (AI) software
  • Benchmark dataset
  • Bias
  • Radiology
  • Validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for the creation of benchmark datasets for reproducible artificial intelligence in radiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this