Abstract
This post hoc analysis assessed the evidence behind common reimbursement practices by evaluating the relationship of body mass index (BMI) ranges (<30, 30-35 and >35 kg/m(2) ) with treatment effects of exenatide twice daily among patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients received exenatide twice daily added to insulin glargine in two 30-week studies (exenatide twice daily vs insulin lispro, n = 627; exenatide twice daily vs placebo, n = 259). No association of baseline BMI with changes in efficacy variables was observed. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions were significant (p < 0.0001) and similar across BMI range groups in the lispro-comparator study and greater for exenatide versus placebo in the placebo-controlled study. Significant weight loss occurred with exenatide across BMI range groups (p < 0.0001), while weight increased with both comparators. Achievement of HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) without weight gain was greater for exenatide versus comparators. Systolic blood pressure decreased across BMI range groups with exenatide in the lispro-comparator study (p < 0.0001); changes in lipids were not clinically meaningful. Minor hypoglycaemia was less frequent for exenatide versus insulin lispro. These findings suggest that BMI alone should not limit clinical decision-making or patient access to medication.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 829-833 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Diabetes obesity & metabolism |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug-2016 |
Keywords
- body mass index
- exenatide twice daily
- type 2 diabetes
- PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST
- TO-TARGET TRIAL
- BASAL INSULIN
- BOLUS INSULIN
- SAFETY
- LIRAGLUTIDE
- MANAGEMENT
- DEGLUDEC