Reliability and discriminant validity of ataxia rating scales in early onset ataxia

R. Brandsma, T. F. Lawerman, M. J. Kuiper, Joke Geffen, van, I. J. Lunsing, H. Burger, T. J. de Koning, J. J. de Vries, M. A. J. de Koning-Tijssen, D. A. Sival

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractAcademic

Abstract

Objective: To determine observer-agreement and discriminantvalidity of ataxia rating scales.Background: In children and young adults, Early Onset Ataxia(EOA) is frequently concurrent with other Movement Disorders,resulting in moderate inter-observer agreement among MovementDisorder professionals. To investigate whether subjective phenotypicassessment is replaceable by quantitative measures, we aimed todetermine inter-observer agreement and discriminant validity ofataxia rating scales.Methods: In 40 EOA patients (15 (5-34) years; mean (range)),three independent pediatric neurologists assessed quantitative ataxiarating scales (ICARS, SARA and BARS), and phenotyped the pri-mary Movement Disorder characteristic (i.e. ataxic, dystonic, myo-clonic, choreatic, tics) in each patient. We determined inter- andintra-observer agreement and specified outcomes for “primary” (i.e.unanimous ataxia identification as the primary feature by all asses-sors and/or genetic ataxic diagnosis (n526)) and “secondary” (i.e.incomplete identification of ataxia as the primary Movement Disor-der (n512)) subgroups.Results: Inter- and intra-observer agreement of ataxia ratingscales revealed high intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC: .92 -.99; for ICARS, SARA and BARS), with no significant differencesbetween “primary” and “secondary” subgroups. Total ataxia ratingscale scores revealed higher outcomes in the “primary” than the“secondary” subgroup (p<.001). A multivariable regression analysisrevealed that the severity of the primary Movement Disorder charac-teristic (b .57- 1.0; p .011 - <.001) predicted these higher quantita-tive outcomes. The primary movement characteristic itself did notpredict higher outcomes.Conclusions: In EOA, quantitative ataxia rating scales revealhigh inter- and intra-observer reliability, reflecting reliable applicabil-ity. However, multivariable regression analysis revealed low discrim-inant validity between ataxia and other Movement Disordercharacteristics. Despite high reliability of quantitative ataxia scores,these data implicate that preceding phenotypic characterizationremains irreplaceable.
Original languageEnglish
Article number915
Pages (from-to)S356-S356
Number of pages1
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume30
Issue numberSupplement 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun-2015
Event19th International Congress of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders - San Diego, Canada
Duration: 14-Jun-201518-Jun-2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and discriminant validity of ataxia rating scales in early onset ataxia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this