Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands

J Tuinstra; FLP van Sonderen; JW Groothoff; WJA van den Heuvel; D Post

Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands

J Tuinstra^*, FLP van Sonderen, JW Groothoff, WJA van den Heuvel, D Post

^*Corresponding author for this work

Public Health Research (PHR)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reliability, validity and structure of the 30 item Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire were investigated in a sample consisting of 1642 Dutch adolescents. The original structure of five subscales was not found to be sufficient in our data. Therefore a revised ADMQ was proposed, with four subscales and 22 items. A cross validation study proved that this revised ADMQ was improved for its structure and reliability. Also, the revised ADMQ proved to be a convergent and discriminative valid instrument indicated by associations with peer group pressure and differences for sex and school level. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	273-285
Number of pages	13
Journal	Personality and Individual Differences
Volume	28
Issue number	2
Publication status	Published - Feb-2000

Keywords

PATTERNS

Access to Document

http://share.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/FILES/root2/2000/Relivaans/Tuinstra_2000_Personality_and_Individual.pdf

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{82675719178842ed9c9bf6f5fb69834d,

title = "Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands",

abstract = "The reliability, validity and structure of the 30 item Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire were investigated in a sample consisting of 1642 Dutch adolescents. The original structure of five subscales was not found to be sufficient in our data. Therefore a revised ADMQ was proposed, with four subscales and 22 items. A cross validation study proved that this revised ADMQ was improved for its structure and reliability. Also, the revised ADMQ proved to be a convergent and discriminative valid instrument indicated by associations with peer group pressure and differences for sex and school level. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.",

keywords = "PATTERNS",

author = "J Tuinstra and {van Sonderen}, FLP and JW Groothoff and {van den Heuvel}, WJA and D Post",

year = "2000",

month = feb,

language = "English",

volume = "28",

pages = "273--285",

journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",

issn = "0191-8869",

publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

number = "2",

}

Tuinstra, J , van Sonderen, FLP, Groothoff, JW, van den Heuvel, WJA & Post, D 2000, 'Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands', Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 273-285. <http://share.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/FILES/root2/2000/Relivaans/Tuinstra_2000_Personality_and_Individual.pdf>

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands

AU - Tuinstra, J

AU - van Sonderen, FLP

AU - Groothoff, JW

AU - van den Heuvel, WJA

AU - Post, D

PY - 2000/2

Y1 - 2000/2

N2 - The reliability, validity and structure of the 30 item Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire were investigated in a sample consisting of 1642 Dutch adolescents. The original structure of five subscales was not found to be sufficient in our data. Therefore a revised ADMQ was proposed, with four subscales and 22 items. A cross validation study proved that this revised ADMQ was improved for its structure and reliability. Also, the revised ADMQ proved to be a convergent and discriminative valid instrument indicated by associations with peer group pressure and differences for sex and school level. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The reliability, validity and structure of the 30 item Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire were investigated in a sample consisting of 1642 Dutch adolescents. The original structure of five subscales was not found to be sufficient in our data. Therefore a revised ADMQ was proposed, with four subscales and 22 items. A cross validation study proved that this revised ADMQ was improved for its structure and reliability. Also, the revised ADMQ proved to be a convergent and discriminative valid instrument indicated by associations with peer group pressure and differences for sex and school level. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - PATTERNS

M3 - Article

SN - 0191-8869

VL - 28

SP - 273

EP - 285

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

IS - 2

ER -

Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this