Abstract
The reliability, validity and structure of the 30 item Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire were investigated in a sample consisting of 1642 Dutch adolescents. The original structure of five subscales was not found to be sufficient in our data. Therefore a revised ADMQ was proposed, with four subscales and 22 items. A cross validation study proved that this revised ADMQ was improved for its structure and reliability. Also, the revised ADMQ proved to be a convergent and discriminative valid instrument indicated by associations with peer group pressure and differences for sex and school level. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 273-285 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Personality and Individual Differences |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Feb-2000 |
Keywords
- PATTERNS
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability, validity and structure of the Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire among adolescents in The Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver