Abstract
“Action” is one of those categories that seem simple at first glance but that become more and more difficult and complex the more we try to figure out what exactly we mean by it. If a person’s legs are moving, does this mean that this person moved her legs? And if she indeed moved her legs, was this an intentional action or did it sim-ply happen? And if she indeed performed an intentional action, was the reason for the action conscious to herself or can her intention only be reconstructed from outside? Simple cases such as this one have triggered theoretical thinking in various disciplines, from philosophy to behavioral science, to sociology and psychology. In all these disciplines, there is a tendency to differentiate “action” from “doing something,” “happening,” or “behavior”—differentiations usually made with reference to intentionality , reason , or agency . A certain behavior becomes “action” as soon as the actor is performing an intentional act that can be interpreted in a situational structure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Theory, Religion, Critique: Classical and Contemporary Approaches. |
Subtitle of host publication | Classical and Contemporary Approaches. |
Editors | Richard King |
Place of Publication | New York |
Publisher | Columbia University Press |
Chapter | 35 |
Pages | 385–391 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780231145428 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780231145435 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |