Repressive administrative law: assessing culpability in Dutch social security regulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
264 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With the introduction of strict obligations and sanctions in social security, the traditional boundary between criminal law and administrative law seems to fade away. Administrative fines in particular facilitate strict, efficient and effective law enforcement. In spite of the fact that administrative fines are part of administrative law, criminal law safeguards are still applicable. This could cause problems, since administrative authorities and administrative judges are not necessarily familiar with these criminal law principles. This article addresses the question of how administrative authorities and administrative judges assess culpability when deciding on administrative fines in the Netherlands. The main finding is that administrative authorities, and especially municipalities, overestimate the degree of culpability. The case shows that, in the search for more repressive instruments, it is imperative to allow courts to keep an eye on the proportionality of the sanctions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-30
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Security
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Court procedures
  • administrative law
  • law enforcement
  • fines
  • penalties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repressive administrative law: assessing culpability in Dutch social security regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this