Resilience, resistance, infrapolitics and enmeshment

Philippe Bourbeau, Caitlin Ryan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)
    594 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    A great deal has been written in the International Relations literature about the role of resilience in our social world. One of the central debates in the scholarship concerns the relationship between resilience and resistance, which several scholars consider to be one of mutual exclusivity. For many theorists, an individual or a society can either be resilient or resistant, but not both. In this article, we argue that this understanding of the resilience–resistance connection suffers from three interrelated problems: it treats resilience and resistance as binary concepts rather than processes; it presents a simplistic conception of resilient subjects as apolitical subjects; and it eschews the ‘transformability’ aspect of resilience. In a bid to resolve these issues, the article advocates for the usefulness of a relational approach to the processes of resilience and resistance, and suggests an approach that understands resilience and resistance as engaged in mutual assistance rather than mutual exclusion. The case of the Palestinian national liberation movement illustrates our set of arguments.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)221-239
    Number of pages9
    JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    Early online date17-Feb-2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1-Mar-2018

    Keywords

    • STRATEGY
    • CLOSURE
    • SECURITY
    • EVERYDAY

    Cite this