Resource Processing, Early Pottery and the Emergence of Kitoi Culture in Cis-Baikal: Insights from Lipid Residue Analysis of an Early Neolithic Ceramic Assemblage from the Gorelyi Les Habitation Site, Eastern Siberia

Manon Bondetti*, Alexandre Lucquin, Nikolai Savelev, Andrzej Weber, Oliver E. Craig, Peter Jordan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
59 Downloads (Pure)


In the early Holocene, Mesolithic hunter-gatherer communities inhabiting the Cis-Baikal region of Eastern Siberia were participating in a series of important cultural changes. These included the establishment of large cemeteries in the Angara Valley and on the Southwest shores of Lake Baikal, culminating in the formation of the distinctive Early Neolithic Kitoi cultural pattern ca. 7560 cal. BP. Around the same time, the appearance of clay pots in a few Kitoi graves and at some contemporary habitation sites marks the formal transition to the Early Neolithic, which is defined in Russian archaeology by the emergence of pottery (and not the transition to farming). Little is known about how this early pottery was used, and why it was first adopted into the region.
This pilot-study presents lipid-residue analysis of a selection of sherds from the oldest and relatively well-dated
pottery assemblage in the Cis-Baikal region, which was recovered from the Gorelyi Les habitation site. The results indicate that the pots had been used to process a broad spectrum of food resources, including ruminants,
fish and plants, and possibly resin and other by-products derived from pine trees, suggesting that the vessels
were being used as general-purpose cooking containers. We conclude that there is scope for a much larger-scale
investigation of diversity and change in prehistoric pottery use in Cis-Baikal, and that this research would improve
current understandings of the diet, health and subsistence strategies of the Kitoi and other prehistoric
Original languageEnglish
Article number100225
Number of pages13
JournalArchaeological Research in Asia
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2020

Cite this