Abstract
The concept of ‘scaffolding’ introduced by Wood et al. (1976) figures prominently in educa-tional research but lacks the empirical rigour that allows researchers to establish whetheror not teacher assistance to students is an instance of scaffolding. We used conversa-tion analysis to provide an empirical basis to the notion of ‘responsiveness’ (contingency)that Wood et al. treat as a fundamental characteristic of scaffolding. We analyzed dyadicteacher–student interactions in Dutch 1st grade secondary school mathematics classes anddeveloped responsiveness as an interactional phenomenon: the concept has to rest on theanalysis of how the learner’s actions and the tutor’s responses are interactionally broughtabout.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 57-69 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Linguistics and Education |
Volume | 26 |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Scaffolding; Teacher–student interaction; Contingency; Responsiveness; Tutoring; Conversation analysis