Rethinking the bounds of regional justice: A scoping review of spatial justice in EU regions

Bram van Vulpen, Bettina Bock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

418 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper contributes to the debate on spatial justice in a geography of regional uneven development in the EU. The purpose of this study is to provide a philosophically grounded and empirically informed review of how regional inequality relates to spatial justice. This is done inventorying spatial injustices through a systematic literature review, unravelling the kind of injustices based on a philosophical principle and categorisation of (in)justice. The paper starts with a discussion of how spatial justice has been conceptualised, looking more particularly into Nancy Fraser’s egalitarian understanding of social justice. Her tripartite distinction of justice as (re)distribution, recognition, and representation allows us to re-examine regional inequality and to sharply formulate what is understood as just or unjust. Through a spatial reinterpretation of Fraser’s prism, we then re-examine 134 empirical papers carefully selected with a scoping review method. Our results reveal six manifestations of regional injustice in the EU, which not only encompass an unequally distributed regional development of economic wealth and access to services, but also signal a cultural hierarchy imprinting territorial stigmas and neglecting environmental issues, as well as a political geographical divide of deeply felt rural and regional misrepresentation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-34
Number of pages30
JournalRomanian Journal of Regional Science
Volume14
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2020

Keywords

  • spatial justice
  • social justice
  • regional inequality
  • left-behind regions
  • rural resentment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking the bounds of regional justice: A scoping review of spatial justice in EU regions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this