Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions

Masha Medvedeva; Martijn Wieling; Michel Vols

doi:10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3

Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions

Masha Medvedeva, Martijn Wieling, Michel Vols

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

196 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss previous research in automatic prediction of court decisions. We define the difference between outcome identification, outcome-based judgement categorisation and outcome forecasting, and review how various studies fall into these categories. We discuss how important it is to understand the legal data that one works with in order to determine which task can be performed. Finally, we reflect on the needs of the legal discipline regarding the analysis of court judgements.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	195–212
Journal	Artificial Intelligence and Law
Volume	31
Early online date	25-Jan-2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3
Publication status	Published - 2023

Access to Document

10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3Licence: CC BY

Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisionsFinal publisher's version, 704 KBLicence: CC BY

Handle.net

Persistent link

EVICT : The Impact of the International Right to Housing on National Legal Discourse: Using Data Science Techniques to Analyse Eviction Litigation
Vols, M. (PI), Wieling, M. (Researcher), Bruijn, M. (Postdoc), Hoops, B. (CoPI), Roorda, B. (Member), Mohammadi, M. (Postdoc), Quintiá Pastrana, A. (Postdoc), Whitehouse, L. (Advisor), Schmid, C. (Advisor), van Dijck, G. (Advisor), Arts, K. (Advisor), Prakken, H. (Advisor), de Vries, J. (Advisor) & Zauner-Lohmeyer, K. (Advisor)
01/01/2021 → …
Project: Research

File

Cite this

@article{1a0407c871ee46c88e3699ab98788898,

title = "Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions",

abstract = "In this paper, we discuss previous research in automatic prediction of court decisions. We define the difference between outcome identification, outcome-based judgement categorisation and outcome forecasting, and review how various studies fall into these categories. We discuss how important it is to understand the legal data that one works with in order to determine which task can be performed. Finally, we reflect on the needs of the legal discipline regarding the analysis of court judgements.",

author = "Masha Medvedeva and Martijn Wieling and Michel Vols",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "195–212",

journal = "Artificial Intelligence and Law",

issn = "0924-8463",

publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions

AU - Medvedeva, Masha

AU - Wieling, Martijn

AU - Vols, Michel

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - In this paper, we discuss previous research in automatic prediction of court decisions. We define the difference between outcome identification, outcome-based judgement categorisation and outcome forecasting, and review how various studies fall into these categories. We discuss how important it is to understand the legal data that one works with in order to determine which task can be performed. Finally, we reflect on the needs of the legal discipline regarding the analysis of court judgements.

AB - In this paper, we discuss previous research in automatic prediction of court decisions. We define the difference between outcome identification, outcome-based judgement categorisation and outcome forecasting, and review how various studies fall into these categories. We discuss how important it is to understand the legal data that one works with in order to determine which task can be performed. Finally, we reflect on the needs of the legal discipline regarding the analysis of court judgements.

U2 - 10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3

DO - 10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3

M3 - Article

SN - 0924-8463

VL - 31

SP - 195

EP - 212

JO - Artificial Intelligence and Law

JF - Artificial Intelligence and Law

ER -

Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions

Abstract

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Projects

EVICT : The Impact of the International Right to Housing on National Legal Discourse: Using Data Science Techniques to Analyse Eviction Litigation

Cite this