Risk factors for incomplete small-bowel capsule endoscopy: should capsule retention be considered independently? Response

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	820-820
Number of pages	1
Journal	Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume	70
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.025
Publication status	Published - Oct-2009

Access to Document

@article{0efdb8965e3f42929e539d747a290d24,

title = "Risk factors for incomplete small-bowel capsule endoscopy: should capsule retention be considered independently? Response",

author = "Jessie Westerhof and Weersma, {Rinse K.} and Koornstra, {Jan J.}",

year = "2009",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.025",

language = "English",

volume = "70",

pages = "820--820",

journal = "Gastrointestinal endoscopy",

issn = "0016-5107",

publisher = "MOSBY-ELSEVIER",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors for incomplete small-bowel capsule endoscopy

T2 - should capsule retention be considered independently? Response

AU - Westerhof, Jessie

AU - Weersma, Rinse K.

AU - Koornstra, Jan J.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.025

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.025

M3 - Letter

SN - 0016-5107

VL - 70

SP - 820

EP - 820

JO - Gastrointestinal endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal endoscopy

IS - 4

ER -