Safety and Efficacy of First-Line Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Safety of Avastin in Lung trial (MO19390)

Janessa Laskin*, Lucio Crino, Enriqueta Felip, Fabio Franke, Vera Gorbunova, Harry Groen, Guo-liang Jiang, Martin Reck, Claus-Peter Schneider

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    64 Citations (Scopus)
    778 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Introduction: Safety of Avastin in Lung (MO19390) was an international, open-label, single-arm study, which assessed the safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab (Avastin (R)) in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients (n = 2212) with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A preplanned subgroup analysis was performed to examine these outcomes in elderly patients older than 65 years.

    Methods: Eligible patients with nonsquamous NSCLC received up to six cycles of bevacizumab (7.5 or 15 mg/kg) plus any standard of care chemotherapy. Patients who did not experience disease progression after induction therapy continued bevacizumab therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was safety; secondary end points included time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS).

    Results: Data were evaluated for 623 patients older than 65 years (mean age 70.6). The majority were Whites (86.2%) with stage IV disease (79.7%) and had adenocarcinoma (83.5%). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) of special interest was similar for elderly and younger patients (any grade bleeding 38.2% versus 38.3%; any grade hypertension 33.1% versus 30.6%; any grade proteinuria 33.4% versus 29.3%). Most AEs were grade less than or equal to 2. Serious AEs were reported in 45.3 and 34.7% of elderly and younger patients, respectively. Median OS was similar in elderly and younger patients (14.6 months in both age groups), as were TTP (8.2 versus 7.6 months), response rate (49.3% versus 52.4%), and disease control rate (89.3% versus 88.4%). Similar results were seen in a post hoc comparison of the older than 70 years and 70 years or younger subgroups: TTP was 8.6 months versus 7.7 months, respectively; OS was 14.6 months in both subgroups; response rate was 49% and 52%, respectively; incidence of AEs of special interest was comparable.

    Conclusion: Patients older than 65 years with nonsquamous NSCLC derive a similar clinical benefit from first-line bevacizumabbased therapy as their younger counterparts and do not experience increased toxicity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)203-211
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Thoracic Oncology
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan-2012

    Keywords

    • Bevacizumab
    • Vascular endothelial growth factor
    • Safety
    • Elderly
    • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    • PHASE-III TRIAL
    • RANDOMIZED-TRIAL
    • SINGLE-AGENT
    • PLATINUM COMBINATIONS
    • GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
    • CISPLATIN
    • CARBOPLATIN
    • VINORELBINE
    • PACLITAXEL
    • THERAPY

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and Efficacy of First-Line Bevacizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Safety of Avastin in Lung trial (MO19390)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this