Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis

Martin Schweinsberg*, Michael Feldman*, Casper Albers, Eric Luis Uhlmann*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

78 Citations (Scopus)
127 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists’ gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for organizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-249
Number of pages22
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume165
Early online date17-Jun-2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this