Self-serving evaluation of conflict behavior and escalation of the dispute

C.K.W. De Dreu*, A. Nauta, E. Van de Vliert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is good evidence that people generally tend to evaluate behaviors, contributions, and outcomes in terms favorable to the self. The present series of studies expands this finding by showing that professional negotiators (Study 1), governmental decision makers (Study 2), and organizational consultants (Study 3) make self-serving evaluations of conflict behavior: They view their own conflict behaviors as more constructive and as less destructive than those of their opponents. In addition, results revealed that self-serving evaluation of conflict behavior is associated with increased frustration, with reduced problem solving, and with enhanced likelihood of future conflict. It is argued that these findings expand the conflict literature in that they provide better insight into the motivational-cognitive antecedents and consequences of conflict escalation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2049-2066
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of applied social psychology
Volume25
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Dec-1995

Keywords

  • BIASES
  • ATTRIBUTION
  • PERCEPTION
  • ATTENTION
  • JUDGMENT

Cite this