Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review

Sara T. Nøland*, Morten S. Magnø, Tor P. Utheim, Xiangjun Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    49 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Purpose: In this review, we aimed to investigate the literature on sex-specific prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and to determine whether women or men are more at risk for MGD. 

    Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed using the terms: (Sex OR Gender OR prevalence) AND (Meibomian gland). 

    Results: Twenty-four relevant studies on MGD prevalence were identified, including 10 population-based and 14 hospital-based studies. Among the population-based studies, five studies reported higher rates among men, three studies found no differences, and one study observed higher rates among women. In the hospital-based studies, 10 studies reported no difference, two found higher rates among men, and one found higher among women. In the reviewed literature, there was a considerable variation between studies in terms of quality, sample size, age ranges, diagnostic criteria. 

    Conclusions: While most of the population-based studies suggest a higher prevalence among men, the majority of clinic-based studies show no significant difference. Further research with larger samples and standardized criteria is needed to determine whether men are indeed more susceptible to MGD.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)447-457
    Number of pages11
    JournalCurrent Eye Research
    Volume49
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2024

    Keywords

    • DED
    • gender
    • MGD
    • prevalence
    • sex

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this