Abstract
Purpose: In this review, we aimed to investigate the literature on sex-specific prevalence of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and to determine whether women or men are more at risk for MGD.
Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed using the terms: (Sex OR Gender OR prevalence) AND (Meibomian gland).
Results: Twenty-four relevant studies on MGD prevalence were identified, including 10 population-based and 14 hospital-based studies. Among the population-based studies, five studies reported higher rates among men, three studies found no differences, and one study observed higher rates among women. In the hospital-based studies, 10 studies reported no difference, two found higher rates among men, and one found higher among women. In the reviewed literature, there was a considerable variation between studies in terms of quality, sample size, age ranges, diagnostic criteria.
Conclusions: While most of the population-based studies suggest a higher prevalence among men, the majority of clinic-based studies show no significant difference. Further research with larger samples and standardized criteria is needed to determine whether men are indeed more susceptible to MGD.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 447-457 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Current Eye Research |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- DED
- gender
- MGD
- prevalence
- sex
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Sex Differences in the Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Mini Review
Nøland, S. T. (Creator), Magnø, M. S. (Creator), Utheim, T. P. (Creator) & Chen, X. (Creator), Taylor & Francis Group, 10-Jan-2024
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.24971751, https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sex_Differences_in_the_Prevalence_of_Meibomian_Gland_Dysfunction_A_Mini_Review/24971751
Dataset