Sex-specific associative learning cues and inclusive fitness benefits in the Seychelles warbler

DS Richardson*, T Burke, J Komdeur

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)
295 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In cooperative, breeding vertebrates, indirect fitness benefits would be maximized by subordinates that accurately assess their relatedness to group offspring and preferentially help more closely related kin. In the Seychelles warbler (Acrocephalus sechellensis), we found a positive relationship between subordinate-nestling kinship (determined using microsatellite marker genotypes) and provisioning rates, but only for female subordinates. Female subordinates that helped were significantly more related to the nestlings than were nonhelpers, and the decision to help appears to be based on associative learning cues. High levels of female infidelity means that subordinates cannot trust their legitimacy through the male line, consequently they appear to use the continued presence of the primary female, but not the primary male, as a reliable cue to determine when to feed nestlings. By using effective discrimination, female subordinates are able to maximize the indirect benefits gained within. a cooperative breeding system otherwise driven primarily by direct breeding benefits.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)854-861
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2003

Keywords

  • associative learning
  • cooperative breeding
  • helpers
  • indirect fitness
  • kinship
  • sex-specific cues
  • Seychelles warbler
  • EXTRA-GROUP PATERNITY
  • HELPING-BEHAVIOR
  • ACROCEPHALUS-SECHELLENSIS
  • EVOLUTION
  • KINSHIP
  • CONSTRAINTS
  • HELPERS
  • BIRDS
  • DISPERSAL
  • MECHANISM

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex-specific associative learning cues and inclusive fitness benefits in the Seychelles warbler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this