TY - JOUR
T1 - Social and Emotional Loneliness Among Divorced and Married Men and Women
T2 - Comparing the Deficit and Cognitive Perspectives
AU - Dykstra, Pearl A.
AU - Fokkema, Tineke
N1 - Relation: http://www.rug.nl/
date_submitted:2009
Rights: University of Groningen
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Data from the 1998 survey “Divorce in the Netherlands” (N = 2,223) are used to analyze differences
in loneliness among divorced and married men and women. The results indicate that it
makes sense to distinguish social from emotional loneliness. This is consistent with the deficit
perspective, which posits that the absence of specific types of relationships is associated with
specific forms of loneliness. Whereas social loneliness is largely attributable to support network
deficits, emotional loneliness is associated with the absence of a partner. In line with the
cognitive perspective, the results show that greater insight into loneliness is obtained when discrepancies
in relationships are considered. Divorcees who attach great importance to having a
partner and people whose marriages are conflict ridden tend to have the highest levels of emotional
loneliness. Our study shows that to explain loneliness, one should take not only characteristics
of people’s relationships into consideration, but also their relationship preferences.
The investment hypothesis, which also follows from the cognitive perspective, is not supported
by the data. There is no indication that those who attach greater importance to having a partner
invest less in relationships with friends, relatives, and colleagues and therefore showhigh levels
of social loneliness. Consistent gender differences are observed:Men, regardless of partner status,
tend to attach greater importance to having a partner than do women, and they tend to have
smaller support networks and higher levels of social loneliness. Among the divorced, men are
more apt to suffer from emotional loneliness than are women.
AB - Data from the 1998 survey “Divorce in the Netherlands” (N = 2,223) are used to analyze differences
in loneliness among divorced and married men and women. The results indicate that it
makes sense to distinguish social from emotional loneliness. This is consistent with the deficit
perspective, which posits that the absence of specific types of relationships is associated with
specific forms of loneliness. Whereas social loneliness is largely attributable to support network
deficits, emotional loneliness is associated with the absence of a partner. In line with the
cognitive perspective, the results show that greater insight into loneliness is obtained when discrepancies
in relationships are considered. Divorcees who attach great importance to having a
partner and people whose marriages are conflict ridden tend to have the highest levels of emotional
loneliness. Our study shows that to explain loneliness, one should take not only characteristics
of people’s relationships into consideration, but also their relationship preferences.
The investment hypothesis, which also follows from the cognitive perspective, is not supported
by the data. There is no indication that those who attach greater importance to having a partner
invest less in relationships with friends, relatives, and colleagues and therefore showhigh levels
of social loneliness. Consistent gender differences are observed:Men, regardless of partner status,
tend to attach greater importance to having a partner than do women, and they tend to have
smaller support networks and higher levels of social loneliness. Among the divorced, men are
more apt to suffer from emotional loneliness than are women.
U2 - 10.1080/01973530701330843
DO - 10.1080/01973530701330843
M3 - Article
VL - 29
SP - 1
JO - Basic and Applied Social Psychology
JF - Basic and Applied Social Psychology
SN - 0197-3533
IS - 1
ER -