Stability and relative validity of the Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile (NMDIP)

Isaac Bos*, Jan B. M. Kuks, Josue Almansa, Hubertus P. H. Kremer, Klaske Wynia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
229 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the stability and relative validity (RV) of the Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile (NMDIP) using criterion-related groups. In a previous study the NMDIP-scales showed good internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity. Known-groups analysis showed that the NMDIP discriminates between categories of extent of limitations.

Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey study was performed on patients diagnosed with a NMD and registered at the Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands.

Participants were asked to complete the preliminary NMDIP, the Medical Outcome study Short Form Questionnaire (SF-36), the World Health Organization Quality Of Life-abbreviation version (WHOQOL-bref), and two generic domain specific:measures the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (IPAQ). The variables 'Extent of Limitations' and 'Quality of Life' were used to create criterion-related groups. Stability over time was tested using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for paired samples and the intraclass-correlation coefficients for repeated measures. RV was examined by comparing the ability of NMDIP with generic multidimensional health impact measures, and domain specific measures in discriminating between criterion-related subgroups using the Kruskal-Wallis H-test.

Results: Response rate was 70% (n = 702). The NMDIP-scales showed sufficient stability over time, and satisfactory or strong RV. In general, the NMDIP scales performed as well as or better than the concurrent measurement instruments.

Conclusions: The NMDIP proved to be a valid and reliable disease-targeted measure with a broad scope on physical, psychological and social functioning.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalBMC NEUROLOGY
Volume17
Issue number87
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11-May-2017

Keywords

  • Neuromuscular Disease Impact Profile
  • Relative validity
  • Test-retest reliability
  • Stability
  • Criterion validity
  • TESTING PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
  • HEALTH SURVEY SF-36
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
  • CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK
  • PARTICIPATION
  • VALIDATION
  • MSIP

Cite this