Stable isotope quality assurance using the 'Calibrated IRMS' strategy

Procedures in our laboratory have always been directed towards complete understanding of all processes involved and corrections needed etc., instead of relying fully on laboratory reference materials. This rather principal strategy (or attitude) is probably not optimal in the economic sense, and is not necessarily more accurate either. Still, it has proven to be very rewarding in its capability to detect caveats that go undiscovered in the standard way of measurement, but that do influence the accuracy or reliability of the measurement procedure. An additional benefit of our laboratory procedures is that it makes us capable of assisting the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) with primary questions like mutual scale assignments and comparison of isotope ratios of the same isotope in different matrices (like delta(18)O in water, carbonates and atmospheric CO(2)), establishment of the (17)O-(18)O relation, and the replenishment of the calibration standards. Finally, for manual preparation systems with a low sample throughput ( and thus only few reference materials analysed) it may well be the only way to produce reliable results.