Statistische versus klinische gelijkwaardigheid

Translated title of the contribution: Statistical versus clinical equivalence; the effectiveness of non-invasive neurostimulation in depression

S M van Belkum*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    There is increasing interest in the use of non-invasive neurostimulation in the treatment of depressive disorder. A recent meta-analysis compared different forms of neurostimulation, and concluded that the effectiveness of different forms of this therapy, for example repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), was similar to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). In this comment we discuss these different techniques; we also stress that an unfair comparison has been made between the different forms of neurostimulation. In daily practice, techniques such as ECT, rTMS, and tDCS are used in different patient groups. ECT, in particular, is highly effective in patients suffering from a major depressive disorder with psychotic features, but this patient group has not been sufficiently included in the studies incorporated with a consequent negative bias towards ECT in this meta-analysis.

    Translated title of the contributionStatistical versus clinical equivalence; the effectiveness of non-invasive neurostimulation in depression
    Original languageDutch
    Article numberD4396
    JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
    Volume164
    Issue number25
    Publication statusPublished - 16-Jun-2020

    Cite this