Abstract
Quasi-realists are expressivists who say much of what realists say. To avoid making their view indistinguishable from realism, however, they usually stop short of saying everything realists say. Many realists therefore think that something important is missing from quasi-realism. I argue that quasi-realists can undermine this thought by defending a version of quasi-realism that I call super-quasi-realism. This version seems indistinguishable from realism, but I argue that this is a mistaken impression that arises because we cannot believe super-quasi-realism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Nous |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1-Dec-2023 |