Surgery for necrotising enterocolitis: primary anastomosis or enterostomy?

FN Hofman, NMA Bax*, DC van der Zee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ideal surgical management of neonates with necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is still a matter of debate. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of bowel resection with primary anastomosis with the results of bowel resection with enterostomy. Sixty-three neonates with NEC had a bowel resection in the acute phase of the disease in the period between February 1990 and March 2001. Thirty-four of them (54%) underwent resection of the bowel with primary anastomosis (Group A), and 29 (46%) had resection with enterostomy (Group B). Group A had a lower gestational age and lower birth weight. Mortality, complication rate, and postoperative weight gain were not significantly different between the groups. However, Group B had a significantly longer primary hospital stay (80+/-49 days versus 58+/-31 days, P

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)481-483
Number of pages3
JournalPediatric Surgery International
Volume20
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2004

Keywords

  • necrotising enterocolitis
  • surgery
  • primary anastomosis
  • enterostomy
  • PERITONEAL DRAINAGE
  • HIGH JEJUNOSTOMY
  • RESECTION
  • EXPERIENCE
  • MANAGEMENT
  • NEC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgery for necrotising enterocolitis: primary anastomosis or enterostomy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this