Talk Less to Strangers: How Homophily Can Improve Collective Decision-Making in Diverse Teams

Jonas Stein*, Vincenz Frey, Andreas Flache

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Identity diversity in teams brings advantages for complex decision-making because it is associated with cognitive diversity among team members. At the same time, homophilous interactions along shared identity dimensions can hinder information exchange among dissimilar individuals and threaten successful exploitation of the team’s cognitive diversity. We present an agent-based model to investigate how homophily impacts decision-making quality in diverse teams. Team members communicate information in a ‘hidden profile’
setting where some pieces of information are known only to single individuals while other pieces of information are known to subgroups with the same identity. While intuition may suggest that homophily impairs collective decision-making, our model reveals how homophilous environments lead to better collective decisions: homophily fosters temporary disagreements between dissimilar team members, which grant teams additional time to uncover crucial information that would not have been shared otherwise. Longer discussion
time comes along with improvements in the quality of the final decision, indicating a trade-off between the time needed to deliberate and decision quality.
Original languageEnglish
Article number14
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31-Jan-2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Talk Less to Strangers: How Homophily Can Improve Collective Decision-Making in Diverse Teams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this