Abstract
To coordinate the redundant degrees of freedom (DOF) in the action system, synergies are often proposed. Synergies organize DOF in temporary task-specific units emerging from interactions among task, organism, and environmental constraints. We examined whether task constraints affect synergies, end-effector kinematics, or both. To this end, we compared synergies and end-effedor kinematics when participants (N = 15) performed discrete movements of identical amplitude in manual reaching (stationary targets) and manual lateral interception (moving targets, with different angles of approach). We found that time-velocity profiles were roughly symmetric in teaching, whereas they had a longer decelerative tail and showed an angle-of-approach effect in interception. Uncontrolled manifold analyses showed that in all conditions joint angle variability was primarily awariation, indicating a synergistic organization. The analysis on the clusters of joint angle configurations demonstrated differences between reaching and interception synergies, whereas more similar synergies were used within interception conditions. This implies that some task constraints operate at the level of synergies while other task constraints only affect end-effector kinematics. The results support a 2-step process in the organization of DOF, consisting of synergy formation and further constraining of synergies to produce the actual movement, as proposed by Kay (1988).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1511-1526 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec-2020 |
Keywords
- emergent synergies
- reaching
- interception
- UCM analysis
- end-effector kinematics
- JOINT ANGLE VARIABILITY
- MUSCLE SYNERGIES
- HIERARCHICAL CONTROL
- PHASE-TRANSITIONS
- COORDINATION
- MOVEMENTS
- HAND
- PERTURBATION
- PREHENSION
- ACCURACY