Temporal selection is suppressed, delayed, and diffused during the attentional blink

Edward Vul, Mark Nieuwenstein, Nancy Kanwisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How does temporal selection work, and along what dimensions does it vary from one instance to the next? We explored these questions using a phenomenon in which temporal selection goes awry. In the attentional blink, subjects fail to report the second of a pair of targets (T1 and T2) when they are presented at stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) of roughly 200 to 500 ms. We directly tested the properties of temporal selection during the blink by analyzing distractor intrusions at a fast rate of item presentation. Our analysis shows that attentional selection is (a) suppressed, (b) delayed, and (c) diffused in time during the attentional blink. These effects are dissociated by their time course: The measure of each effect returns to the baseline value at a different SOA. Our results constrain theories of the attentional blink and indicate that temporal selection varies along at least three dissociable dimensions: efficacy, latency, and precision.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-61
Number of pages7
JournalPsychological Science
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION
  • REPETITION BLINDNESS
  • MEMORY
  • MODEL

Cite this