Testing the combination of Feeling Safe and peer counselling against formulation-based cognitive behaviour therapy to promote psychological wellbeing in people with persecutory delusions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (the Feeling Safe-NL Trial)

  • Eva Tolmeijer*
  • , Felicity Waite
  • , Louise Isham
  • , Laura Bringmann
  • , Robin Timmers
  • , Arjan van den Berg
  • , Hanneke Schuurmans
  • , Anton B.P.(Tonnie) Staring
  • , Paul de Bont
  • , Rob van Grunsven
  • , Gert Stulp
  • , Ben Wijnen
  • , Mark van der Gaag
  • , Daniel Freeman
  • , David van den Berg
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
140 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Persecutory delusions are strong threat beliefs about others’ negative intentions. They can have a major impact on patients’ day-to-day life. The Feeling Safe Programme is a new translational cognitive-behaviour therapy that helps patients modify threat beliefs and relearn safety by targeting key psychological causal factors. A different intervention approach, with growing international interest, is peer counselling to facilitate personal recovery. Combining these two approaches is a potential avenue to maximize patient outcomes. This combination of two different treatments will be tested as the Feeling Safe-NL Programme, which aims to promote psychological wellbeing. We will test whether Feeling Safe-NL is more effective and more cost-effective in improving mental wellbeing and reducing persecutory delusions than the current guideline intervention of formulation-based CBT for psychosis (CBTp). Methods: A single-blind parallel-group randomized controlled trial for 190 out-patients who experience persecutory delusions and low mental wellbeing. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to Feeling Safe-NL (Feeling Safe and peer counselling) or to formulation-based CBTp, both provided over a period of 6 months. Participants in both conditions are offered the possibility to self-monitor their recovery process. Blinded assessments will be conducted at 0, 6 (post-treatment), 12, and 18 months. The primary outcome is mental wellbeing. The overall effect over time (baseline to 18-month follow-up) and the effects at each timepoint will be determined. Secondary outcomes include the severity of the persecutory delusion, general paranoid ideation, patient-chosen therapy outcomes, and activity. Service use data and quality of life data will be collected for the health-economic evaluation. Discussion: The Feeling Safe-NL Trial is the first to evaluate a treatment for people with persecutory delusions, while using mental wellbeing as the primary outcome. It will also provide the first evaluation of the combination of a peer counselling intervention and a CBT-based program for recovery from persecutory delusions. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25766661 (retrospectively registered 7 July 2022).

Original languageEnglish
Article number644
Number of pages16
JournalTrials
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2023

Keywords

  • Cognitive behaviour therapy
  • Paranoia
  • Peer counselling
  • Persecutory delusions
  • Psychosis
  • Randomized controlled trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the combination of Feeling Safe and peer counselling against formulation-based cognitive behaviour therapy to promote psychological wellbeing in people with persecutory delusions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (the Feeling Safe-NL Trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this