Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conditions were studied that may invalidate health-state values derived from the visual analogue scale (VAS).
METHODS: Respondents were asked to place cards with descriptions of EQ-5D health states on a 20 cm EuroQol VAS and modified versions of it, positioning them such that the distances between the states reflect their valuation for these states. Anchor-point bias was examined using the standard EuroQol VAS (n = 212) and a modified version (n = 97) with a different lower anchor. Context bias was examined in another group of respondents (n = 112) who valued three different sets of EQ-5D health states. Marker bias was studied in yet another group of respondents (n = 100) who placed the same EQ-5D states on the standard EuroQol VAS and on a modified VAS without anchors, categories, or measurement markers.
RESULTS: No indication for the existence of the anchor-point and the marker bias was found. However, the VAS valuations were significantly affected by the context of the set of health states in the scaling task.
CONCLUSION: Advanced methodologies should be incorporated in VAS valuation studies to deal with the context bias.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1651-1661 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Quality of Life Research |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec-2006 |
Keywords
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Female
- Health Status
- Health Status Indicators
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Pain Measurement