TY - JOUR
T1 - The Challenging World of Simple Inorganic Rings
T2 - Revisiting Roesky's Ketone and Roesky's Sulfoxide
AU - Cunha, Ana V.
AU - Havenith, Remco W.A.
AU - Van Alsenoy, Christian
AU - Blockhuys, Frank
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
PY - 2023/12/1
Y1 - 2023/12/1
N2 - The surprising differences between the experimental solid-state and calculated gas-phase structures of 5-oxo-1,3,2,4-dithiadiazole (Roesky's ketone, 1) and 1-oxo-1,2,4,3,5-trithiadiazole (Roesky's sulfoxide, 2), identified and studied in a series of papers published between 2004 and 2010 but then never satisfactorily explained, have been revisited, making use of the more advanced computational possibilities currently available. The previous calculations’ considerable overestimations of the C−S and S−S bond lengths in 1 and 2, respectively, have been partly explained based on the results of periodic calculations and the application of Valence Bond (VB) Theory. In the case of 1, the crystal environment appears to stabilize a structure with a highly polarized C=O bond, which features a C−S bond with considerable double-bond character – an effect which does not exist for the isolated molecule – explaining the much shorter bond in the solid state. For 2, a similar conclusion can be drawn for the S−S distance. For both compounds, though, packing effects are not the sole source of the differences: the inability of Density Functional Theory (DFT) to properly deal with the electronic structures of these apparently simple main-group systems remains a contributing factor.
AB - The surprising differences between the experimental solid-state and calculated gas-phase structures of 5-oxo-1,3,2,4-dithiadiazole (Roesky's ketone, 1) and 1-oxo-1,2,4,3,5-trithiadiazole (Roesky's sulfoxide, 2), identified and studied in a series of papers published between 2004 and 2010 but then never satisfactorily explained, have been revisited, making use of the more advanced computational possibilities currently available. The previous calculations’ considerable overestimations of the C−S and S−S bond lengths in 1 and 2, respectively, have been partly explained based on the results of periodic calculations and the application of Valence Bond (VB) Theory. In the case of 1, the crystal environment appears to stabilize a structure with a highly polarized C=O bond, which features a C−S bond with considerable double-bond character – an effect which does not exist for the isolated molecule – explaining the much shorter bond in the solid state. For 2, a similar conclusion can be drawn for the S−S distance. For both compounds, though, packing effects are not the sole source of the differences: the inability of Density Functional Theory (DFT) to properly deal with the electronic structures of these apparently simple main-group systems remains a contributing factor.
KW - dithiadiazole
KW - molecular geometry
KW - solid-state geometry
KW - trithiadiazole
KW - valence bond theory
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85174285066
U2 - 10.1002/chem.202302449
DO - 10.1002/chem.202302449
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174285066
SN - 0947-6539
VL - 29
JO - Chemistry - A European Journal
JF - Chemistry - A European Journal
IS - 67
M1 - e202302449
ER -